Too much to type but there has been a lot of fuzziness in Swedish crime statistics because they refuse to classify people committing the crimes for their own political purposes.

This is to provide some clarity for those with an open mind.

 

According to some on this forum...Sweden is the best place to live.

Forget about all the rapes, crimes, assaults, suicides, neighborhoods that are forbidden by law enforcement to patrol.

It's Sweden for christ sake.

 

Sweden is only called a 'rape capital' because of the classification of what rape is. In Sweden, rape and molestation is an umbrella term for things like sending explicit messages to someone. And other than that, the statistics don't tell us how many percent of which race does what crime, so there's just no real correlation between the rise of immigrants to rise of rape in Sweden. Here's an article about a new study regarding this topic.

 

I’ve read this article. What specifically did you feel was incorrect about the video?

 

It seems the way Sweden reports crimes hasn't changed. However the number of crimes being committed in Sweden has.

 

It seems to me that a report compiled by a government eager to defend its positions on immigration would be affected by the government sponsoring it. I thought the video on the other hand was quite logical and even handed. The comments below it are also worth reading.

 

Already heard this one from you.

 

Perhaps it is true, but it’s hard to believe that sending explicit messages to someone could be considered rape even by Swedish standards.

I simply find the video more compelling. More cogent. And given the attempted cover up in Cologne and what I described in Austria plus the arrest of a man in London for quoting disparaging things that Churchill said about Islam in his book The River War, it seems like Europe is giving special protections to Muslims both in speech and behavior. Perhaps some one can give me an example of prosecution of a Muslim when he has uttered vicious anti Semitic rhetoric for example. Perhaps it has happened but I doubt it.

 

Then why not move there?

 

Balls Deep as a descriptor of indepth analysis somewhat undermines it, " more likely to be suspected of" is another little gem elided over in there.

Anyone been to Sweden at all?

 

I’ve been to Sweden. My grandmother was 100 percent Swedish and I speak the language enough to get by.

 

Love us some free flowing refugee/immigrants that get free shit that is provided by those that work for a living.

 

The line generally given is that they want to escape the ravages of their own countries but once they leave and are safe in closer European countries they want to move on to Sweden or Germany or the UK because welfare benefits are more generous.

 

Refugees are refugees because of first world interference.

And Churchill was a vile white supremacist.

 

Third world refugees are refugees because they cannot maintain successful societies in their own countries. They bring their intrinsic deficiencies to the first world, spreading crime, disease and terrorism and burdening our welfare and criminal justice systems. Those people have nothing to offer us. It is in our interest to keep them out.

During the Second World War Jewish refugees from Nazi tyranny did not engage in acts of terrorism against their host countries. Muslim refugees from Islamic tyranny often do.

This is an area where I agree with President Trump.

Winston Churchill was the savior of the Jewish and the Slavic people. Hitler intended to exterminate them both.

 

The ravages of their own countries exist because that is the way those people behave. They bring their behavior to civilized countries.

 

Planes head there everyday.

Take your wig off, and make sure everyone can see your dick, hate for you to be a member of the Rape statistics.

 

I like social democracy. Unfortunately, it does not work for those not prepared by the last twelve thousand years of human evolution for the intellectual and social demands of modern civilization.